Mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 122:1

אשם מצורע ששחטו שלא לשמו באנו למחלוקת ר' מאיר ור' אלעזר ור' שמעון ר' מאיר דאמר יביא אחר ויתחיל בתחילה הכא נמי יביא אחר וישחוט

R'Johanan said: If the guilt-offering of a leper had been slaughtered not for its own purpose,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [I.e., he offered it in the name of some other sacrifice. In such a case the sacrifice is valid but is not accounted to the owner in fulfillment of his duty and the owner must consequently bring anew the offering which was due from him.]');">¹</span> - therein we find a dispute between [on the one hand] R'Meir, and R'Eleazar and R'Simeon [on the other]. R'Meir, who said he must bring another one and start all over from the beginning, would here consistently hold that he must bring another [animal as] guilt-offering and slay it, whereas R'Eleazar and R'Simeon, who say: He shall start at the place he had left off before, would hold that here there is no redress.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [R. Meir, who holds that part of a service that has not been completed is of no account, would similarly regard this incomplete guilt-offering as not offered and would require another guilt-offering; whereas R. Eleazar and R. Simeon, who do not disregard that part of the service which had been performed, would hold that he cannot bring a new guilt-offering as Scripture explicitly states 'One lamb for a guilt offering' (Lev. XIV, 12) and not two.]');">²</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 122:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.